Quantum Mechanics |
Give feedback |
I had this short chat with a person on the net. He asked me to help him understand the Schrödinger's cat paradox.
| Me: | So what exactly is it about the measurment of the electron that you find problem with? | |
| Him: | OK... it is said that there is a superposition of the spin until the electron is measured, I get that. Just isn't it that the machine that breaks the vile of glass is the one who does the measurement, not the person looking at the cat? | |
| Me: | Yes, this is a bit strange, I admit, and I think that interpretation of QM is questionable. Do you have a URL to a concise text about it? | |
| Him: | Yeah, http://www.qtc.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cat.html | |
| Me: | Well, you can say like this: This way of looking at QM is very "solipsistic", in the sense that it deals with only one observer, an alone observer (solo ipsus = I am alone). And for that single observer, the cat is not dead, until he knows that the cat is dead. Up until that point, there is only a certain probability, for that alone person, that the cat is dead. | |
| Him: | Oh... I understand now... the cat is physically already dead or alive before the person sees it. Just it's neither dead nor alive until a conscious being "sees it", I get it. | |
| Me: | Yes, another person might already know it, and for him the wave function has already collapsed. But that other person lives in another universe so to say, he is also alone :) | |
| Him: | OK...well thanks for the help | |
| Me: | Did it help? | |
| Him: | Yes... I was kind of running in that direction, I just thought there might be more to it. | |
| Me: | OK, well this is how I understand that interpretation, and it makes sense if every observer is alone, which is a funny assumption, but the only way to reason in this situation it seems. | |
| Him: | Yes. | |
| Me: | OK, good luck whith everything :) | |
| Him: | It's like asking that cliche about the tree in the forest that falls when no one is around. | |
| Me: | Yes, it has a lot to do with that, and I usually think about God who is everywhere and perceives everything when that question is asked :) | |
| Him: | Yes... God does have his philosophical advantages! | |
| Me: | He he he, definitely :) |